Richmond, H. E. (2016) Relationships between power and agency: the role of the ‘theatre designer’ in performance-making processes. Paper presented to: 32nd European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium: Organizing in the Shadow of Power, Naples, 07-09 July 2016.
Presented version (1MB) |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Abstract: | In 2013, the Contemporary Theatre Review dedicated an issue to ‘Alphabet: A Lexicon of Theatre and Performance’. The entry for ‘M’, ‘Mise en Scene’, reflects on the invisible creativity of the ‘unseen work that led to the production’s first night’ (Singleton, 2013, p.47). This paper aims to address an absence of theorising about the ways that professional identities and creative practices of theatre designers are shaped by performance-making practices. Theatre design pedagogy has been selected as the site of investigation because it provides a means by which normative beliefs and practices about ‘being’ a designer and ‘doing’ design, might be evaluated. I consider how designers’ ‘agency’ is expressed and/or implied in contemporary theatre design pedagogies, and the relationship of this to how power is manifested in ‘structures’ (Giddens, 1984) of performance making. I conclude that differences between dramatic or ‘texted’ performance (Schechner, 1968) and devised, site-specific or ‘post-dramatic’ performance (Lehmann, 2006), frame conceptions and enactment of designer agency in different ways. In particular, I focus on three notions of agency; ‘authorial agency’ (Isackes, 2012), ‘professional agency’ (Eteläpelto et al, 2013) and ‘identity agency’ (Hitlin and Elder, 2007). |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Performance design, theatre design, agency, structure, power |
Subjects: |
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology > HM786 Organizational sociology. Organization theory P Language and Literature > PN Literature (General) > PN2000 Dramatic representation. The Theater > PN2085 The stage and accessories |
Creators: | Richmond, Harriet E |
Faculties, Divisions and Institutes: | University Faculties, Divisions and Research Centres - OLD > Faculty of Business & Law |
Date: | 7 July 2016 |
Date Type: | Publication |
Event Title: | 32nd European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) Colloquium: Organizing in the Shadow of Power |
Event Dates: | 07-09 July 2016 |
Event Location: | Naples |
Event Type: | Conference |
Language: | English |
Status: | Published / Disseminated |
Refereed: | Yes |
Related URLs: | |
References: | Aronson, A. (2016) ‘Opening’, in. Symposium Transformations of the Prague Quadrennial since 1999, Archa Theatre Prague. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1E2G8BnLbRw (Accessed: 30 May 2016). Bandura, A. (1982) ‘Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.’, American Psychologist, 37(2), pp. 122–147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122. Bandura, A. (2006) ‘Adolescents’ development of personal agency: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill’, in Pajares, F. and Urdan, T. C. (eds) Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, Conn: IAP - Information Age Pub., Inc (Adolescence and education), pp. 307–337. Bandura, A. (2012) ‘On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited’, Journal of Management, 38(1), pp. 9–44. doi: 10.1177/0149206311410606. Barnett, D. (2008) ‘When is a play not a drama? Two examples of postdramatic theatre texts’, New Theatre Quarterly, 24(01). doi: 10.1017/S0266464X0800002X. Barnett, D. (2016) Post-dramatic theatre, Drama Online. Available at: http://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/genres/post-dramatic-theatre-iid-2516 (Accessed: 21 May 2016). Broadfoot, K. J. and Munshi, D. (2015) ‘Agency as a process of translation’, Management Communication Quarterly, 29(3), pp. 469–474. doi: 10.1177/0893318915585158. Brockett, O. G., Mitchell, M. and Hardberger, L. (2010) Making the scene: a history of stage design and technology in Europe and the United States. San Antonio, Tex: Tobin Theatre Arts Fund. Carlson, M. (2004) Performance: a critical introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. Carmody, J. (1990) ‘Reading scenic writing: Barthes, Brecht, and theatre photography’, Journal of dramatic theory and criticism, 5(1), pp. 25–38. Christilles, D. and Unruh, D. (1996) ‘The semiotics of action design’, Theatre Topics, 6(2), pp. 121–141. doi: 10.1353/tt.1997.0008. Collins, J. and Nisbet, A. (eds) (2010) Theatre and Performance Design : A Reader in Scenography. Oxford: Routledge. Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T. and Mount, L. (1996) ‘Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups.’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), pp. 25–38. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.25. Crawley, G., Society of British Theatre Designers, Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama, Victoria and Albert Museum, Veletržní Palac and Pražské Quadriennale (eds) (2011) Transformation & revelation: UK design for performance 2007 - 2011. Sidcup, [England]: Society of British Theatre Designers. Dehlholm, K. (2016) TALKS - Intersection, Intersection: Intimacy and Spectacle (Undisciplined Project of the Prague Quadrennial). Available at: http://www.intersection.cz/prague/talks/ (Accessed: 29 May 2016). Dinulovic, T. D. (2016) (Do Not) Look Back in Anger. Archa Theatre Prague. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1E2G8BnLbRw (Accessed: 30 May 2016). Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998) ‘What is agency?’, American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), pp. 962–1023. doi: 10.1086/231294. Essin, C. (2011) ‘An aesthetic of backstage labor’, Theatre Topics, 21(1), pp. 33–48. doi: 10.1353/tt.2011.0012. Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P. and Paloniemi, S. (2013) ‘What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work’, Educational Research Review, 10, pp. 45–65. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001. Evans, K. (2007) ‘Concepts of bounded agency in education, work, and the personal lives of young adults’, International Journal of Psychology, 42(2), pp. 85–93. doi: 10.1080/00207590600991237. Fletcher, J. K. (1999) Disappearing acts: gender, power and relational practice at work. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Available at: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3338457. Gell, A. (1998) Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2654428?origin=crossref (Accessed: 26 May 2016). Giddens, A. (2013) The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford: Wiley. Gill, R. (2014) ‘Academics, cultural workers and critical labour studies’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), pp. 12–30. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.861763. Haggard, P. and Chambon, V. (2012) ‘Sense of agency’, Current Biology, 22(10), pp. R390–R392. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.040. Haugaard, M. (2012) ‘Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment’, Journal of Political Power, 5(1), pp. 33–54. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810. Hayward, C. and Lukes, S. (2008) ‘Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: A dialogue’, Journal of Power, 1(1), pp. 5–20. doi: 10.1080/17540290801943364. Hewson, M. (2010) ‘Agency’, in Mills, A., Durepos, G., and Wiebe, E., Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc. Available at: http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/casestudy/n5.xml (Accessed: 15 May 2016). Hitlin, S. and Elder, G. H. (2007) ‘Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency’, Sociological Theory, 25(2), pp. 170–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00303.x. Howard, P. (2002) What is scenography? London; New York: Routledge. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=10053824. Howard, P. (2010) ‘Foreward’, in Collins, J. and Nisbet, A. (eds) Theatre and performance design : A reader in scenography. Oxford: Routledge. Hurworth, R. (2003) ‘Photo-Interviewing for Research’, Research Update, 40. Available at: http://search.proquest.com/docview/60475756?accountid=8630 (Accessed: 13 March 2016). Isackes, R. M. (2008) ‘On the pedagogy of theatre stage design: A critique of practice’, Theatre Topics, 18(1), pp. 41–53. doi: 10.1353/tt.0.0005. Isackes, R. M. (2012) ‘Rethinking The pedagogy Of performance collaboration: Two case studies that assert authorial agency In scenographic education’, in. Performance: Visual Aspects of Performance Practice, Salzberg, Austria. Available at: http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/critical-issues/ethos/performance/project-archives/3rd/session-7-the-scenographer-and-the-scenographic-tools-as-co-authors-in-creating-performance/ (Accessed: 25 March 2016). Kaspersen, L. B. (2000) Anthony Giddens: an introduction to a social theorist. Oxford: Blackwell. Kattenbelt, C. (2010) ‘Intermediality in performance and as a mode of performativity’, in Bay-Cheng, S., Lavendar, A., and Nelson, R. (eds) Mapping Intermediality in Performance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 29–43. King, A. (2010) ‘The odd couple: Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and British social theory: The odd couple’, The British Journal of Sociology, 61, pp. 253–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01288.x. Klich, R. (2013) ‘Performing poetry and the postnarrative text in the theatre of new media’, Contemporary Theatre Review, 23(3), pp. 421–431. doi: 10.1080/10486801.2013.806322. Kockelman, P. (2007) ‘Agency: The relation between meaning, power, and knowledge’, Current Anthropology, 48(3), pp. 375–401. doi: 10.1086/512998. Kunst, B. (2015) ‘The Institution between precarization and participation’, Performance Research, 20(4), pp. 6–13. doi: 10.1080/13528165.2015.1071032. Lacey, S. (1996) ‘Naturalism, poetic realism, spectacle: Wesker’s “The Kitchen” in performance’, New Theatre Quarterly, 12(47), pp. 237–248. doi: 10.1017/S0266464X0001023X. Layton, R. (2003) ‘Art and agency: A reassessment’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(3), pp. 447–464. doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.00158. Leff, T. (1991) ‘Decor or space: Architectural stage design and the contemporary theatre’, Theatre Topics, 1(1), pp. 61–71. Available at: https://muse-jhu-edu.ezproxyd.bham.ac.uk/article/369049 (Accessed: 25 May 2016). Lehmann, H.-T. (2006) Postdramatic theatre. London: Routledge. Loacker, B. (2013) ‘Becoming “culturpreneur”: How the “neoliberal regime of truth” affects and redefines artistic subject positions’, Culture and Organization, 19(2), pp. 124–145. doi: 10.1080/14759551.2011.644671. Marx, K. (1970) Capital. London: Lawrence and Wishart. McKinney, J. and Butterworth, P. (2009) The Cambridge introduction to scenography. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge introductions to literature). Meyer, J. and Jepperson, R. (2000) ‘The “actors” of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency’, Sociological Theory, 18(1), pp. 100–120. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/223284. (Accessed: 15 May 2016). Murray, C. and Gollmitzer, M. (2012) ‘Escaping the precarity trap: a call for creative labour policy’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18(4), pp. 419–438. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2011.591490. Neilson, B. and Coté, M. (2014) ‘Introduction: Are we all cultural workers now?’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), pp. 2–11. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2013.864989. OISTAT (2013) ‘Current Statutes of OISTAT (Organisation Internationale des Scénographes, Techniciens et Architectes de Théâtre)’. Available at: http://www.oistat.org/Item/list.asp?id=1160 (Accessed: 29 May 2016). Osipovich, D. (2006) ‘What is a theatrical performance?’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 64(4), pp. 461–470. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4622191 (Accessed: 28 May 2016). Pansardi, P. (2012) ‘Power to and power over: two distinct concepts of power?’, Journal of Political Power, 5(1), pp. 73–89. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2012.658278. Pavis, P. (2008) ‘On faithfulness: The difficulties experienced by the text/performance couple’, Theatre Research International, 33(02). doi: 10.1017/S0307883308003635. Prague Quadrennial of Performance Design and Space | PQ (2015). Available at: http://www.pq.cz/en/ (Accessed: 30 May 2016). Rebellato, D. (1999) 1956 and all that: the making of modern British drama. London; New York: Routledge. Richmond, H. (2014) ‘The Motley Theatre Design Course: Documenting theatre design pedagogy’, in. Theatre and Performance Research Association Conference 2014, Royal Holloway, University of London. Available at: http://tapra.org/archive/conference-2014/tapra-2014-schedule/ (Accessed: 6 August 2014). Robinson, C. (2007) PQ Forum: From Past to Present, Theatre Design: The Theatre Design Website. Available at: https://theatredesigner.wordpress.com/articles/prague-quadrennial/prague-quadrennial-articles/pq-forum-past-to-present/. Saint-Denis, M. (1960) Theatre. The rediscovery of style. New York: Theatre Arts Books. Schechner, R. (1968) ‘Group V: Improving design for the technical function: scenography, structure and function’, Educational Theatre Journal, 20(2), pp. 311–316. doi: 10.2307/3205069. Scott, J. C. (1985) Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press. Singleton, B. (2013) ‘Mise en scène’, Contemporary Theatre Review, 23(1), pp. 48–49. doi: 10.1080/10486801.2013.765116. Spencer, M. (2013) ‘Documentation AS scenography’. Performing Documents Conference, University of Bristol, 4 December. Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/arts/research/performing-documents/conference/ (Accessed: 13 March 2016). The Linbury Prize (no date). Available at: http://www.linburyprize.org.uk/ (Accessed: 30 May 2016). Thomas, J. M. (2011) ‘The visual poetics of Dmitry Krymov’s Theatre Laboratory’, Contemporary Theatre Review, 21(3), pp. 340–350. doi: 10.1080/10486801.2011.585982. Torstendahl, R. and Burrage, M. (eds) (1990) The formation of professions: knowledge, state and strategy. London: Sage (SCASSS series). Winch, C. (2014) ‘Education and Broad Concepts of Agency’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(6), pp. 569–583. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2013.779211. World Stage Design 2017 (no date). Available at: http://www.wsd2013.com/blog-category/world-stage-design-2017-comes-to-taiwan/ (Accessed: 30 May 2016) |
URI: | http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/id/eprint/8421 |
Actions (login required)
Edit Item |