Siddall, G. (2016) University academics’ perceptions of reading list labels. New Library World. 117(7/8), pp. 440-448. 0307-4803.
- Texts
- Information
Information
Abstract:
Purpose: The purpose of the article is to reflect on the results of a continuing professional development sessions delivered to academics on the importance of a properly annotated reading list to the student experience.
Approach: As part of the session the academics were asked to take part in a ‘pop quiz’ providing their interpretation of commonly used reading list labels.
Findings: There was quite a broad interpretation of the labels, with several eliciting strongly positive or negative reactions. The similarity of meanings between some reading list labels made them redundant for helping students to prioritise their reading.
Value: This case study could be used to provide sessions on reading lists at other institutions and the results from the quiz can be used to simplify reading list labels.
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Reading lists, resource list, Higher Education, reading, University, CPD, Continuing Professional Development
Subjects:
Creators:
Siddall, G.
Publisher:
Emerald
Northamptonshire and East Midlands:
Education, Training and Skills
Faculties, Divisions and Institutes:
Date:
2016
Date Type:
Publication
Page Range:
pp. 440-448
Journal or Publication Title:
New Library World
Volume:
117
Number:
7/8
Language:
English
ISSN:
0307-4803
Status:
Published / Disseminated
Refereed:
Yes
References:
BERA (2011) “Ethical guidelines for educational research, British Educational Research Association“, available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-2011.pdf?noredirect=1 (accessed 25 September 2015).
Brewerton, G. (2014) “Implications of student and lecturer qualitative views on reading lists: a case study at Loughborough University, UK”, New Review of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 20, pp.78-90.
Chelin, J., McEachran, M. and Williams, E. (2005) “Five hundred into 4 won’t go – how to solve the problem of reading list expectations”, SCONUL Focus, Vol.36 (Winter), pp.49-51.
CILIP (2014) Awards. London: CILIP, available from: http://www.cilip.org.uk/library-and-information-research-group/contact-us (accessed 28 July 2015).
Information Literacy Group (2013) Our aims, CILIP, available from: http://www.cilip.org.uk/information-literacy-group/about/our-aims (accessed 12 October 2015).
Institute of Learning and Teaching [n.d.] Home, Institute of Learning and Teaching, available from: http://www.northamptonilt.com/ (accessed 25 September 2015).
LILAC (2013) What is LILAC? LILAC, available from: http://www.lilacconference.com/about-lilac (accessed 12 October 2015).
Maher, J.M. and Mitchell, J. (2010) “I’m not sure what to do! Learning experiences in the humanities and social sciences”. Issues in Educational Research, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp.137 – 148.
Martin, L. and Stokes, P. (2006) “Reading lists under the spotlight: Cinderella or superstar?” SCONUL Focus, Vol. 37 (Spring), pp.33 – 36.
Piscioneri, M. and Hlavac, J. (2012) “The minimalist reading model: Rethinking reading lists in arts and education subjects”. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp.424 – 445.
Siddall, G. and Rose, H. (2014) “Reading lists – time for a reality check? An investigation into the use of reading lists as a pedagogical tool to support the development of information skills amongst Foundation Degree students”. Library and Information Research Journal, Vol. 38 No. 118, pp.52-73.
Stubley, P. (2002) “Going beyond resource discovery”. CILIP Update, Vol. 1 No. 6, pp.52-54.
Talis (2015) Reading lists. Talis, available from: http://talis.com/reading-lists/ (accessed 25 September 2015).
Thompson, L., Mahon, C. and Thomas, L. (2003/2004) Reading lists – how do you eat yours? Learning and Teaching Projects [online]. Centre for Learning and Teaching. University of Wolverhampton, available from: www.wlv.ac.uk/celt (accessed 16 November 2013).
 |