Northampton Electronic Collection of Theses and Research

Testing the theory of morphic resonance using recognition for Chinese symbols: a failure to replicate

Roe, C. A. and Hitchman, G. A. (2011) Testing the theory of morphic resonance using recognition for Chinese symbols: a failure to replicate. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. 75(4), pp. 211-224. 0037-1475.

Item Type: Article
Abstract: Rupert Sheldrake’s theory of morphic resonance suggests a means by which the thoughts or behaviours of a species contribute to a collective ‘morphogenetic field’ that can encourage future organisms to prefer those thoughts and behaviours that had been selected most frequently. Sheldrake has argued that an individual’s acquisition of language could thus be influenced by the morphic resonance of past speakers of that language, and this has enabled researchers to empirically test the theory using learning activities that involve a language unfamiliar to the participant. For example, Robbins and Roe (2010) gave participants a set of Chinese symbols to learn and found that they correctly recalled more genuine characters (for which a morphogenetic field would presumably exist) than imitative characters (for which one would not), as predicted by Sheldrake’s theory. However, potential shortcomings were identified within the experimental design, and so the current study was intended to replicate earlier findings with a more robust research design that used a more comprehensive system of randomising across participants. An opportunity sample of 101 participants were shown, in a randomised order, 8 genuine and 8 imitative characters. They then took part in a distractor task by playing ‘scissors-paper-stone’ against a computer opponent for 1 minute. Subsequently, participants were presented with symbols in pairs (one genuine and one imitative) matched for complexity and radical component (a key element of the character) and were asked to indicate if they recalled seeing either character at the presentation stage. For some trials, participants had previously seen one of the characters whereas in others, both symbols were novel. Participants correctly identified a similar number of real and imitative characters, whereas they exhibited more false memories for the imitative characters. Furthermore, the proposed relationships between the purported morphic resonance effect and transliminality and openness to experience were not supported. These findings fail to confirm those reported by Robbins and Roe (2010) and support an explanation in terms of methodological artifact
Uncontrolled Keywords: Parapsychology; morphic resonance
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF1161 Telepathy. Mind reading. Thought transference
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF309 Consciousness. Cognition
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology > BF1001 Parapsychology. Psychic research. Psychology of the conscious
Creators: Roe, Chris A and Hitchman, Glenn A
Publisher: Society for Psychical Research
Faculties, Divisions and Institutes: University Faculties, Divisions and Research Centres - OLD > Research Centre > Centre for the Study of Anomalous Psychological Processes
University Faculties, Divisions and Research Centres - OLD > School of Social Sciences (to 2016)
University Faculties, Divisions and Research Centres - OLD > Faculty of Health & Society > Psychology
Faculties > Faculty of Health & Society > Psychology
Research Centres > Centre for Psychology and Social Sciences
Date: October 2011
Date Type: Publication
Page Range: pp. 211-224
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of the Society for Psychical Research
Volume: 75
Number: 4
Language: English
ISSN: 0037-1475
Status: Published / Disseminated
Refereed: Yes
References: Agar, W., Drummond, F., Tiegs, O., & Gunson, M., (1953). Fourth (Final) report on a Test of McDougall’s Larmarckian Experiment on the Training of Rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 307-321. Blackmore, S., & Rose, N. (1997). Reality and imagination: A psi conducive confusion? Journal of Parapsychology, 61, 321 335. BPS (2009). Code of Ethics and Conduct: Guidance published by the Ethics Committee of the British Psychological Society. Leicester: The British Psychological Society. Goldberg, L.R. (1999). A broad-bandwith, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several Five-Factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary, F. de Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.). Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press. Gow, A.J., Whiteman, M.C., Pattie, A., & Deary I.J. (2005). Goldberg’s IPIP Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 317-329. Holt, N. J., Simmonds-Moore, C. A., & Moore, S. L. (2008). Psi, belief in the paranormal, attentional filters and mental health. Paper presented at the Bial Foundation Convention, Porto, Portugal. Lamarck, J., (1809). Philosophie Zoologique. Paris: Flammarion. Lefebvre, L., (1995). The opening of Milk Bottles by Birds: Evidence for Accelerated Learning Rates, but against the Wave of Advance Model of Cultural Transmission. Behavioral Processes, 34(1), 43-53. Lublow, R. (1989). Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Luke, D.P., Roe, C.A., & Davison, J. (2008). Testing for forced-choice precognition using a hidden task: Two replications. Journal of Parapsychology, 72, 133-154. Mahlberg, A. (1987). Evidence of Collective Memory: A Test of Sheldrake’s Theory. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 32, 23-34. Mauskopf, S.H., & McVaugh, M.R. (1980). The elusive science: Origins of experimental psychical research. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. Mikulecky, M. ,(1996). Rose versus Sheldrake: Chronobiology the Winner? Biology Forum, 89, 469-478. Robbins, K., & Roe, C.A. (2010). An empirical test of the theory of morphic resonance using recognition for Chinese symbols. Explore 6(4), 256-262. Roe, C.A. (2003). Revisiting false memories as a vehicle for psi. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 67, 281-295. Rose, S. (1992). So-called “formative causation”: A hypothesis disconfirmed. Response to Rupert Sheldrake. Biology Forum, 85(3/4), 445-453. Sheldrake, R. (1981). A New Science of Life. Houghton Mifflin: Boston Sheldrake, R. (1983). Formative Causation: The Hypothesis Supported. New Scientist, 100, 279-280. Sheldrake, R. (1988a). The Presence of the Past. London: Collins. Sheldrake, R. (1988b). Cattle fooled by phoney grids. New Scientist, February 1, 65. Sheldrake, R. (1992). An Experimental Test of the Hypothesis of Formative Causation. Biology Forum 86, 431-444. Sheldrake, R. (1995). A New Science of Life: The hypothesis of morphic resonance. Rochester, VM: Park Street Press. Thalbourne, M., (2000). Transliminality: A Review. International Journal of Parapsychology, 11(2), 1-34

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item