Fitzgerald, R. (2011) To what extent does a digital audio feedback strategy support large cohorts? Paper presented to: 10th European Conference on e-Learning (ECEL-2011), Brighton Business School, University of Brighton, 10-11 November 2011. (Unpublished)
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Abstract: | The UK National Student Survey (NSS) regularly highlights student dissatisfaction with feedback, identifying factors such as timeliness; personalisation; specific information on how to improve in a clear and understandable manner and the level of detail given to students related to learning outcomes. For a large cohort, achieving these targets can be difficult and students are more likely to be at risk of receiving rushed and vague feedback as lecturers strive to return results as quickly as possible. In his research into the use of digital audio for feedback in the JISC Sounds Good Project, Bob Rotherham suggests that audio may be a way to assist “lecturers looking for a way of giving students good quality feedback on their work whilst saving time” Rotherham (2008, p1). Saunders et al (2005) suggests that a good teacher is one will take advantage of ICT opportunities in order to enrich the students experience, and this research evaluates the potential to provide meaningful, quality feedback to a large group of first year students on a Information Management module at Northampton Business School, via digital audio files. Using an action research methodology, this first cycle of research evaluates the process from the creation of the digital audio files right through to the personalised approach of returning the files to the students via the virtual learning environment. This paper analyses the effect of the experience on the lecturers involved and through subsequent group discussion and questionnaires, this research also evaluates the thoughts of the students involved and considers the overall impact on both home and international students. Initial results indicate that for large cohorts there is no simple answer but electronic feedback is certainly seen as more personal, more beneficial and digital audio may have some unexpected benefits for stakeholders. This paper will identify how this method will be reviewed for a further action research cycle |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Learning and teaching, feedback, technology enhanced learning |
| Subjects: |
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1033.5 Communication in education L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1028.43 Computers in education. Web-based instruction. Educational technology L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2366 College examinations. Assessment |
| Creators: | Fitzgerald, Rachel |
| Faculties, Divisions and Institutes: |
University Faculties, Divisions and Research Centres - OLD > Faculty of Business & Law > Information Sciences (from 2011) Faculties > Faculty of Business & Law > Business Systems & Operations |
| Date: | 9 November 2011 |
| Date Type: | Presentation |
| Event Title: | 10th European Conference on e-Learning (ECEL-2011) |
| Event Dates: | 10-11 November 2011 |
| Event Location: | Brighton Business School, University of Brighton |
| Event Type: | Conference |
| Language: | English |
| Status: | Unpublished |
| References: | Bols, A. (2010) What Students Want: feedback on assessment; Educational Developments; SEDA; 11:4; 7 Brown, G. (2001) Assessment: A Guide for Lecturers. LTSN Assessment Series: No 3; York, LTSN Generic Centre. Copley, J. (2007) Audio and Video Podcasts of lectures for campus-based students: production and evaluation of student use; Innovations in Education and Teaching International; 44:4; 387-399 Ederisingha, P., Salmon, G. (2007) Pedagogical models for podcasts in higher education; Beyond Distance Research Alliance; [online] http://hdl.handle.net/2381/405 Accessed (22/2/11) Ferrance, E. (2000). Action research. Providence, RI: Brown University, Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory. Fish, W., Lumadue, R. (2010) A Technologically Based Approach to Providing Quality Feedback to Students: A Paradigm Shift for the 21st Century; Academic Leadership The Online Journal [online] http://www.academicleadership.org/article/A_Technologically_Based_Approach_to_Providing_Quality_Feedback_to_Students_A_Paradigm_Shift_for_the_21st_Century Accessed (28/1/11) Gibbs, G. (1981) Teaching Students to Learn: A student centred approach. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004) Conditions under which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning: Learning and Teaching in Higher Education; 1:1 Harvey, J. & Mogey, N. (1999). Pragmatic issues when integrating technology into the assessment of students: In Brown, S., Race, P. & Bull, J. (1999) (Eds), Computer-assisted assessment in higher education; London; Kogan-Page. Holmes, K., Papageorgiou, G. (2009) Good Bad and Sufficient: Students’ expectations, perceptions and uses of feedback; Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education; 8:1: 85-96 Hughes, I. (1997) Action Research Electronic Reader [online] http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arr/arow/rintro.html Accessed (23/2/11) JISC (2009) Effective Practice in a Digital Age; Bristol; JISC Innovation Group Kaplan-Leiserson, E. (2005) Podcasting in Academic and Corporate Learning. Learning Circuits [online] https://www.astd.org/LC/2005/0605_kaplan.html, Accessed (8/1/11) Kemmis, S. (2006) Participatory Action Research and the public sphere; Educational Action Research; 14:4; pp 459 -476 Kemmis, S; MacTaggart, R. (2005) Participatory Action Research: Communicative action and the public sphere in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (Eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, London, Sage. Kerr, W., McLaughlin, P. (2008) The Benefit of Screen Recorded Summaries in Feedback for Work Submitted Electronically; Loughborough University [online] http://hdl.handle.net/2134/5363 Accessed (16/1/11) Koshy, V. (2005) Action research for improving practice: A practical guide. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Lipsett, A. (2007) Student’s biggest concern is feedback, Guardian [online] http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/sep/12/highereducation.uk2, Accessed (10/1/11) McTaggart, R. (1989) 16 Tenets of Participatory Action Research [online] http://www.caledonia.org.uk/par.htm Accessed (25/2/11) Merry, S., Orsmond, P. (2007) Students’ Attitudes to and Usage of Academic Feedback Provided Via Audio Files; Bioscience Education eJournal [online] http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol11/beej-11-3.pdf, Accessed (25/1/11) NUS (2010) Charter of Feedback and Assessment [online] http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/asset/news/6010/FeedbackCharter-toview.pdf, Accessed (30/1/11) O’Brien, R. (1998) An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research [online] http://www.web.net/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html, Accessed 20/1/11 O’Leary, Z. (2004) The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London: Sage O’Leary, Z. (2005) Researching Real World Problems. London: Sage Price, M. (2007) Should we be giving less feedback; Centre for Bioscience Bulletin [online] http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/ftp/newsletters/bulletin22.pdf Accessed (20/1/11) Rani, N., Yahya, A. (2009) Engaging Learners in their studies via feedback; Teaching and Learning Open Forum [online] http://www.curtin.edu.my/TLForum2009/images/TLOF09-18.pdf Accessed (20/12/10) Rotherham, B. (2008) Using an MP3 to give feedback on student assignments; Educational Developments; SEDA; 8:2 [online] http://sites.google.com/site/soundsgooduk/downloads/MP3_recorder_for_feedback.pdf? Accessed (10/1/11) Rotherham, B. (2009a) It wasn’t me, guv!; Educational Developments. SEDA; 10:1 Rotherham, B. (2009b) Sounds Good: Quicker, better assessment using audio feedback; JISC Final Report [online] http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/usersandinnovation/sounds%20good%20final%20report.doc, Accessed (15/1/11) Rust, C. (2001) A Briefing on Assessment of Large Groups, Assessment Series No 12; York; LTSN Generic Centre. Saunders, M., Charlier, B., Bonamy, J. (2005) Using Evaluation to create ‘Provisional Stabilities’; Evaluation the International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice; 11:1; 37-54 Wadsworth, Y. (1998) What is Participatory Action Research; Action Research International [online] http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html, Accessed (25/1/11) |
| URI: | http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/id/eprint/3789 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |
Altmetric
Altmetric
Altmetric