• Skip to main content
  • Accessibility information
Contact us
  • Accessibility
  • Staff
  • Students
The University of Northampton

The University of Northampton

Site tools

  • Advanced Search
  • Site Map
Search

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • About us
  • Study
  • Research
  • Social enterprise
  • Business & community
  • Alumni
  • Login
  • NECTAR Home
  • NECTAR FAQs
  • Browse Publications
  • Advanced Search
  • JISC Project
  • Contact
  • Help with NECTAR

Phenotypic selection on flowering phenology and size in two dioecious plant species with different pollen vectors

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Munguia-Rosas, M. A., Ollerton, J. and Parra-Tabla, V. (2011) Phenotypic selection on flowering phenology and size in two dioecious plant species with different pollen vectors. Plant Species Biology. 26(3), pp. 205-212. 0913-557x.
  • Information
Creators:Munguia-Rosas, M. A., Ollerton, J. and Parra-Tabla, V.
Abstract:
Dioecious plants may be pollinated biotically by animals or abiotically via wind or water currents. It has been hypothesized that these two types of pollen vectors might impose contrasting selective pressures on plant flowering phenology. In the present study we describe the flowering phenology of two sympatric dioecious species with contrasting pollination modes: Mercurialis perennis (wind-pollinated) and Tamus communis (insect-pollinated). We estimated selection differentials and gradients for flowering time and flowering synchrony. As flowering time might depend on the accumulation of enough internal resources, we also estimated direct and indirect selection on plant size. Both species have male-biased sexual ratios, and males are bigger and produce larger flower displays than females, but only in T. communis do males bloom earlier and for longer than females. Selection gradients suggest that selection tends to favor early-flowering females of T. communis. There is no evidence of direct current selection on the flowering phenology of M. perennis. Intersexual differences in phenology fit with sex allocation and sexual selection theories. As we hypothesized, phenology of the animal-pollinated species is under stronger selection than that of the wind-pollinated species and we discuss the potential role of pollen vectors in shaping the flowering phenologies of the study species
Official URL:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(IS...
Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:Dioecy; flowering phenology; mutualism; phenotypic selection; wind pollination
Subjects:Q Science > QK Botany > QK900 Plant ecology > QK914 Plant phenology
Q Science > QK Botany > QK926 Pollination
Q Science > QK Botany > QK710 Plant physiology > QK830 Flowering
Schools and Departments:Research Group > Landscape and Biodiversity Research Group
School of Science and Technology (from 2010) > Environmental and Material Sciences
DOI:10.1111/j.1442-1984.2011.00320.x
Date:July 2011
Repository Staff Only: item control page
Top

Main switchboard

01604 735500

Course enquiries

0800 358 2232

study@northampton.ac.uk

  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions

Follow us

Follow us on twitter Follow us on youtube Follow us on flickr Follow us on facebook

Find us

Avenue Campus
Map of Avenue Campus
Park Campus
Map of Park Campus

Copyright © 2010 The University of Northampton