Power, A. and Thomas, C. (2018) Restorative supervision for student midwives: the professional midwifery advocate in the classroom. British Journal of Midwifery. 26(5), pp. 344-346. 0969-4900.
The files below are currently restricted to repository staff only.
They may be awaiting processing or under a publisher's embargo.
Items under embargo will be available for download from the date noted.
![[img]](http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Abstract: | Women and their families are entitled to high quality, safe and effective maternity care, yet reports have identified failings in areas of care such as risk assessment and care planning. As a result, there have been fundamental changes in the way midwives are regulated in the UK. With these changes came the development of a new model for midwifery clinical supervision, aligned to the aims of the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England to provide a high quality service, delivered by resilient, highly valued, well-supported midwives. This article will consider the role of a Professional Midwifery Advocate in a university setting to explore how the early introduction of the role and implementation of group-based restorative supervision may positively impact on student midwives' training, reduce attrition rates, encourage the development of resilience and foster an ethos of peer support. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | PMA, restorative clinical supervision, pre-registration midwifery education, A-EQUIP, resilience |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics > RG950 Midwifery |
| Creators: | Power, Alison and Thomas, Cheryl |
| Publisher: | MA Healthcare Ltd. |
| Faculties, Divisions and Institutes: |
University Faculties, Divisions and Research Centres - OLD > Faculty of Health & Society > Midwifery Faculties > Faculty of Health & Society > Midwifery |
| Date: | 2 May 2018 |
| Date Type: | Published Online |
| Page Range: | pp. 344-346 |
| Journal or Publication Title: | British Journal of Midwifery |
| Volume: | 26 |
| Number: | 5 |
| Language: | English |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2018.26.5.344 |
| ISSN: | 0969-4900 |
| Status: | Published / Disseminated |
| References: | Baird B, Murray R, Seale B, Foot C, Perry C. Midwifery regulation in the United Kingdom. London: The King’s Fund: 2015 Care Quality Commission. A new start: Consultation on changes to the way CQC regulates, inspects and monitors care. Newcastle upon Tyne: CQC; 2013 Department of Health and Social Care. Proposals for changing the system of midwifery supervision in the UK. London: Department of Health; 2016 Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2013 Gillman L. Reframing midwifery supervision: a discussion paper. London: RCM; 2015 Hunter B, Warren L. Investigating resilience in midwifery. Cardiff: Cardiff University; 2013 Kirkup B. The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation. London: The Stationery Office; 2015 National Maternity Review. Better Births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England. London: NHS England; 2016 NHS England. Leading Change Adding Value; a framework for nursing, midwifery and care staff. London: NHS England; 2016 NHS England. A-EQUIP: a model of clinical midwifery supervision. London: NHS England; 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards for pre-registration midwifery education. London: NMC; 2009 Nursing and Midwifery Council (2018) Revalidation. http:// revalidation.nmc.org.uk/ (accessed 16 April 2018) Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. Midwifery supervision and regulation: recommendations. London: The Stationery Office; 2013 Pettit A, Stephen R. Supporting health visitors and fostering resilience literature review. London: Institute of Health Visiting; 2015 Power A. Midwifery in the 21st century: are students prepared for the challenge? British Journal of Midwifery. 2016; 24(1): 66–8. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2016.24.1.66 Proctor B. Supervision: a co-operative exercise in accountability. In: Marken M, Payne M (eds). Enabling and Ensuring— Supervision in Practice. Leicester: National Youth Bureau, Council for Education and Training in Youth and Community Work; 1986 Royal College of Midwives. State of Maternity Services Report 2016. London: RCM; 2016 |
| URI: | http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/id/eprint/10363 |
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |
Altmetric
Altmetric