Northampton Electronic Collection of Theses and Research

Debate: Decolonising Fascist Studies

Liburd, L. and Jackson, P. (2021) Debate: Decolonising Fascist Studies. Fascism. 10(2), pp. 323-345. 2211-6249.

[A][B][+][-]
17696:37444
[thumbnail of Liburb_Jackson_Fascism_2021_Decolonising_Fascist_Studies]
Liburb_Jackson_Fascism_2021_Decolonising_Fascist_Studies
Liburb_Jackson_Fascism_2021_Decolonising_Fascist_Studies.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Information
Abstract:
The drive to decolonise is of central importance to the study of fascism, which after all was and remains a politics rooted in specific conceptions of colonialism and race. In this article, we have invited both leading academics and early career scholars to reflect on how we might ‘decolonise’ fascist studies. Their comments approach fascism in a range of contexts, and offer reflections on how to frame future research questions, approach methodological issues, and consider how fascism studies might develop a more overt and clear stance on the problems posed by decolonising the subject area more broadly. It is hoped that these commentaries will enrich the field of fascist studies and, in turn, do more to relate it to the work of scholars in other relevant areas of study, particularly those working on critical theories of race and racism. Contributors to this debate are: Leslie James, Raul Carstocea, Daniel Hedinger, Liam J. Liburd, Cathy Bergin, Benjamin Bland, Evan Smith, Jonathan Hyslop, Benjamin Zachariah, and Caroline Campbell.
Uncontrolled Keywords:
decolonisation, fascist studies
Creators:
Liburd, L. and Jackson, P.
Date:
26 November 2021
Date Type:
Publication
Page Range:
pp. 323-345
Journal or Publication Title:
Fascism
Volume:
10
Number:
2
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1163/22116257-bja10039
ISSN:
2211-6249
Status:
Published / Disseminated
Refereed:
No
Related URLs:
Edit Item