Nikitina-den Besten, O. (2008) Cars, dogs and mean people: environmental fears and dislikes of children in Berlin and Paris. Urban Trends in Berlin and Amsterdam. 110, pp. 116-125. 1430-4775.
- Information
Information
Abstract:
The new social studies of childhood consider children active and creative users of their immediate environments. To make our cities more child-friendly, we need to understand how children perceive and explore their neighbourhoods, what they find attractive or unattractive about them. The research was carried out in socially and architecturally contrasted areas of two European capitals -Paris and Berlin, and involved, on the whole, 200 schoolchildren aged 10-13. To study children's attitudes towards spaces and places in these areas, I used a questionnaire and the method of subjective maps: children were asked to draw their way home from school, as well as "their territory", and to mark their maps with specially designed "emoticons".
Rather than studying differences in environmental attitudes between the groups of children, the paper draws on the qualitative analysis of those fears and dislikes that were found in common across the groups. Thus, the research resulted in a typology of children's dislikes and fears associated with their city areas. In particular, it was found out that places "occupied" by "mean or bizarre people", as well as by traffic, are strongly disliked or feared. Unpleasant images of the past (memories or "urban myths") or of the future (possible dangers) can also play the role of "the symbolical occupants" of a place and make children avoid it. The concept of a symbolically occupied territory is illustrated in a more detail on the example of a social housing estate on the outskirts of Paris. Examples of children's subjective maps are featured in the article.
The research suggests that the next step in making urban environments more child-friendly would be a consultation process with children - their participatory involvement in the planning and design of city spaces
Uncontrolled Keywords:
Children,urban segregation, educational segregation, drawings, subjective maps, child-centred research methods, visual methods
Subjects:
Creators:
Nikitina-den Besten, O.
Funders or Sponsors:
DAAD, Mairie de Paris
Publisher:
Geographisches Institut des Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin
Faculties, Divisions and Institutes:
Date:
2008
Date Type:
Publication
Page Range:
pp. 116-125
Journal or Publication Title:
Urban Trends in Berlin and Amsterdam
Volume:
110
Language:
English
ISSN:
1430-4775
Status:
Published / Disseminated
Refereed:
Yes
Related URLs:
References:
Barker, J. and Weller, S. (2003): “Never work with children? ”: the geography of methodological issues in research with children. In: Qualitative Research, Vol. 3(2), pp. 207-227.
Beckmann, C. (2004): “Hier sind wir Lehrer die einzigen Auslaender”. Die Welt. 20 December 2004.
Bernard, P. and Herzberg, N. (2006): Cités en questions. La politique de la ville au chevet de la banlieue. Le Monde 2. 4 February 2006.
Bénabou, R., Kramarz, F. and Prost, C. (2005): The French Zones d'Education Prioritaire: much ado about nothing? Discussion paper. Centre for Economic Policy Research. London. Burton, L.M. and Jarrett, R.L. (2000): In the Mix, yet on the Margins: the place of families in urban neighborhood and child development research. In: Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (4), pp. 1114-1135.
Furstenberg, F.F. (1993): How Families Manage Risk and Opportunity in Dangerous Neighborhoods. In: Wilson, W.J. (ed.) Sociology and the Public Agenda. Newbery Park. CA: Sage Publications, pp.231-258.
Halseth, G. and Doddridge, J. (2000): Children's Cognitive Mapping: a potential tool for neighbourhood planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 27(4), pp. 565 – 582.
Kopietz, A. (2006): Einzelfaelle oder Trend? Berliner Zeitung. 17 November 2006.
Lovell, N. (Ed.) (1998): Locality and Belonging. Routledge.
Matthews, H. (2001): Children and Community Regeneration: creating better neighbourhoods. London.
Matthews, H. and Limb, M. (1999): Defining an Agenda for the Geography of Children: review and prospect. In: Progress in Human Geography, 23, pp. 61-90.
Matthews, M.H. (1992): Making Sense of Place: children’s understanding of large-scale environments. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994): Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook. London.
O’Brien, M., Jones, D., Sloan, D. and Rustin, M. (2000): Children’s Independent Spatial Mobility in the Urban Public Realm. In: Childhood, Vol. 7 (3), pp. 257-277.
Pincon, M. et Pincon-Charlot, M. (2004): Sociologie de Paris. Paris, La Découverte.
Plarre, P. (2006): Polizei loest Krawall auf. Die Tageszeitung. 17 November 2006.
Punch, S. (2002): Research with Children: the same or different from research with adults? In: Childhood, Vol. 9(3), pp.321-341.
Ren, J. Y. (2005): “Are you a Berliner? ”: Intergrating Second- and Third-Generation Immigrants in Germany. Master’s thesis. Berlin.
Soboczynski, A. (2006): Fremde Heimat Deutschland. Die Zeit. 12 October 2006.
Socially Integrative City programme: http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/soziale_stadt/index_en.shtml; http:// www.quartiersmanagement-berlin.de/english/ and http://www.sozialestadt.de/en/programm/ .
Sozialstrukturatlas Berlin 2003 (2004): Senatsverwaltung fuer Gesundheit, Soziales und Verbraucherschutz. Pressestelle. Berlin.
Spilsbury, J.C. (2005): “We don’t really get to go out in the front yard” – Children’s Home Range and Neighborhood Violence. In: Children’s Geographies, Vol.3, No.1, pp.79-99.
Valentine, G. (1996): Angels and Devils: moral landscapes of childhood. In: Environment and Planning, D: Society and Space, 14, pp. 581-99.
 |